Wellisch

Wellisch v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20235:22-cv-06897California1,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CHRISTIAN WELLISCH, Case No. 22-cv-06897-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION [Re: ECF No. 9]

ASSISTANCE AGENCY,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is a motion to remand by Plaintiff Christian Wellisch. ECF No. 9 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 17 (“Reply”). He argues that Defendant Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency’s (“PHEAA”) Notice of Removal was untimely and failed to establish the amount in controversy. See Mot. PHEAA opposes the motion. ECF No. 16 (“Opp.”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND In 2022, Plaintiff Christian Wellisch filed two actions against PHEAA in Monterey County Superior Court related to his student loans. Declaration of Christian Wellisch, ECF No. 9-1 (“Wellisch Decl.”) ¶¶ 2, 7. On May 31, 2022, Wellisch filed a petition under California Military 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.