Berlinger

Berlinger v. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20233:21-cv-08254California2,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID F. BERLINGER, Case No. 21-cv-08254-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING

PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND

JEAN-JACQUES BIENAIME, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (“BioMarin” or the “Company”), Jean-Jacques Bienaimé (“Bienaimé”), Henry J. Fuchs (“Fuchs”), and Lon Cardon’s (“Cardon”) “Motion,” filed May 25, 2022, “to Dismiss” the Amended Complaint (“AC”). Plaintiffs Local 282 Pension Trust Fund and Local 282 Annuity Trust Fund have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. The Court, having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND2 BioMarin is “a biotechnology company that develops and commercializes . . . therapies to address rare diseases and medical conditions.” (See AC ¶ 3.) Bienaimé, Fuchs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.