Oiyemhonlan

Oiyemhonlan v. Aramark Management Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20234:22-cv-02954California2,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND OIYEMHONLAN, Case No. 22-cv-02954-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

JOINDER AND MOTION FOR

v. REMAND

ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 14 INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Raymond Oiyemhonlan’s motion for joinder and motion to remand. Dkt. Nos. 10. 14. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion for joinder and DENIES the motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initially filed this action in San Francisco County Superior Court in March 2022. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated by Defendant Aramark Facility Services, LLC based on his age and national origin. See generally Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. A (“Compl.”). He alleges that Matthew Bailey, the Senior Director of Support…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.