Williams v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EVERLINE WILLIAMS, Case No. 21-cv-04501-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT
REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY Re: Dkt. No.
LABORATORY,
11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 91 13 (“Mot.”). The motion is fully briefed and the Court held a hearing on the motion on November 14 10, 2022. See Dkt. Nos. 91, 101, 107, 115, 116, 119, 120. For the reasons set forth below, the 15 Court GRANTS the motion.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
17 Defendant filed the motion on September 22, 2022. Dkt. No. 91. Plaintiff’s opposition 18 was due on October 6, 2022, but Plaintiff failed to file an opposition by that date. On October 13, 19 2022, Defendant filed a reply, asking the Court to grant the motion due to Plaintiff’s failure to 20 oppose. Dkt. No. 101. On October 18, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why 21 Defendant’s motion should not be granted for failure to respond. …