Keefer
Keefer v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SALNAVE KEEFER, Case No. 21-cv-07503-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 22. The Court gave the parties leave to brief a motion for summary judgment “limited to the question of whether the disclosure(s) in the form(s) produced to the individual named plaintiff comply with the relevant statutes.” Dkt. No. 17. The motion has been fully briefed and the Court held a hearing on the motion. See Dkt. Nos. 22, 32, 35, 36. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Salnave Keefer applied to work for Defendants (“Ryder”). Dkt. No. 1-1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 21. As part of the application process, Ryder provided Mr. Keefer with a “disclosure and authorization form to perform a background investigation.” Id. Neither party disputes that…