Roffman
Roffman v. REBBL, INC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MEHVA ROFFMAN, Case No. 22-cv-05290-JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND
v. DENYING, IN PART DEFENDANT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
REBBL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Rebbl, Inc. (“Rebbl”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for February 3, 2023, and it HEREBY GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN PART, Rebbl’s motion. BACKGROUND1 Rebbl manufactures, advertises, distributes, and sells Plant Powered Elixir beverages. On the front of the label, Rebbl states that the products contain a specified amount of protein. For example, Roffman alleges that she purchased the Dark Chocolate, Vanilla,…