Camacho

Camacho v. Uppal

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20235:21-cv-09026California194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VIRIDIANA CAMACHO and JIMENA DEL Case No.21-cv-09026-NC ANGEL, a minor by and through his GAL

ADAN DEL ANGEL NERIS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

? DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 34 V.

BUTA UPPAL, CANADA ROAD

= CARRIER, LTD., Defendants. a

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

A || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

|| action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

1g || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 990 || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.