Camacho
Camacho v. Uppal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VIRIDIANA CAMACHO and JIMENA DEL Case No.21-cv-09026-NC ANGEL, a minor by and through his GAL
ADAN DEL ANGEL NERIS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
? DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 34 V.
BUTA UPPAL, CANADA ROAD
= CARRIER, LTD., Defendants. a
The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that
A || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this
|| action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the
1g || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 990 || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24…