Quinto
Quinto v. The Regents of the University of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 KRYSTAL QUINTO, individually and on Case No. 3:22-cv-04429-JD behalf of all other persons similarly situated, 7 Plaintiff, ORDER RE REMAND 8 v.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.
Plaintiff Krystal Quinto sued defendant The Regents of the University of California (“UC”) on behalf of herself and a putative class of California residents, alleging that her “personally identifiable information and protected health information” was unlawfully disclosed in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Cal. Penal Code § 631, the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 56 et seq., and her privacy rights under the California Constitution. Dkt. No. 1, Ex. A (Complaint) ¶¶ 11, 69-97. The complaint was originally filed in Alameda County Superior Court. UC timely removed the action to this Court under the federal officer removal statute. Dkt. No. 1 (Notice of Removal [NOR]). Quinto says that UC was not acting under the direction of a…