Crago

Crago v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20233:16-cv-03938California1,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROBERT CRAGO, et al., Case No. 16-cv-03938-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., et al., DENYING RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Defendants.

15 Pending here are two competing motions. Lead Plaintiff Robert Wolfson and named Plaintiff K. Scott Posson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a renewed motion for class certification, which seeks certification of an issues class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4). See Dkt. 204. Defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., and The Charles Schwab Corporation (collectively, “Schwab”), move to compel arbitration. See Dkt. 203. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is granted, and Plaintiffs’ renewed motion is denied as moot. The factual background of this action has been adequately discussed in prior orders and need not be restated. E.g., Dkt. 192…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.