Lynch v. Matterport, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20233:22-cv-03704California3,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN LYNCH, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, No. C 22-03704 WHA Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

MATTERPORT, INC, LEAVE TO AMEND

14 Defendant.

16 INTRODUCTION Following the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part defendant company and its individual directors’ motion to dismiss, plaintiff moves for leave to file a second amended class action complaint. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The order on the motion to dismiss described the purported facts at issue. See Lynch v. Matterport, Inc., 2022 WL 17740301, at *1–2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2022). Briefly, they are as follows: defendant company Matterport markets 3D cameras that create 3D models of real- world places. Matterport developed the Matterport Service Partner (MSP) program as a way for individuals who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.