Pearl

Pearl v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20233:22-cv-03561California4,836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LARRY PEARL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03561-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants Coinbase Global, Inc. and Coinbase, Inc.’s (collectively, “Coinbase”) “Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings,” filed September 12, 2022. Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which Coinbase has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Coinbase “operates a website from which customers can buy and sell digital assets” (see First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 18), and, in connection therewith, “publicly posts information regarding the asset, including a description of the asset, . . . historical data regarding the asset, . . . [and] links to the asset’s white paper and website, where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.