A.L.
A.L. v. Pleasanton Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 A.L., et al., Case No. 22-cv-03036-CRB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v.
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff A.L., by and through her parent and guardian ad litem, Joseph Lain 14 (“Plaintiffs”) bring various claims against two public educational entities, the Pleasanton 15 Unified School District (“PUSD”) and the Contra Costa County Office of Education 16 (“CCCOE”; together, the “Defendants”), for failure to provide A.L. with an appropriate 17 education. The Court granted in part Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ original 18 complaint with leave to amend. A.L. v. Pleasanton Unified Sch. Dist., No. 22-cv-03036, 19 2022 WL 1652814, at *8 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2022) [hereinafter Pleasanton I]. PUSD and 20 CCCOE now move to dismiss three causes of action in the First Amended Complaint 21 (“FAC”) for failure to state a claim: breach of contract (claim III), breach of the covenant 22 of good faith and fair dealing…