National Association for Gun Rights, Inc. v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20235:22-cv-00501California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN Case No. 22-cv-00501-BLF RIGHTS, INC., et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, REMAND WITHOUT PREJUDICE 9 v. 10 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS Case No. 22-cv-02365-BLF ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs, v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant.

18 On January 10, 2023, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (“HJTA Plaintiffs”) filed a 19 motion to remand. ECF No. 86 (“Mtn.”). On January 26, 2023, Defendants filed an opposition. 20 ECF No. 89 (“Opp.”). Defendants argue that the motion to remand is improper, as there are 21 currently no claims to remand. Opp. at 2-3. The HJTA Plaintiffs have not filed a reply, and the 22 deadline for doing so has passed. The Court finds the motion suitable for submission without oral 23 argument and VACATES the hearing set for April 6, 2023. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 24 On September 30, 2022, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.