Young
Young v. Schultz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACALYN A YOUNG, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05203-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 RONALD J SCHULTZ, Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Ronald J. Schultz’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 20. Plaintiffs Jacalyn Young and Diane Lynn filed an Opposition (ECF No. 21) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 22). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the February 16, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Schultz’s motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs Young and Lynn reside in “The Woodlands,” a townhome complex in Santa Rosa, California. ECF No. 16 ¶¶ 3-5. Young and Lynn are members of The Woodlands Owners’ Association (“HOA”). Id. …