Perez

Perez v. Discover Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20233:20-cv-06896California2,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ILIANA PEREZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06896-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY ACTION PENDING APPEAL

DISCOVER BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 87 Defendant.

12 On March 3, 2022, Discover Bank appealed this Court’s February 4, 2022 decision on plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Reconsideration. Dkt. No. 83. Before the Court is Discover Bank’s motion to stay this action pending resolution of the appeal. Dkt. No. 87. For the reasons set forth below, this court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND I. Underlying Loans1 Plaintiffs Iliana Perez, Flavio Guzman Magaña, and Josue Jimenez Magaña allege Discover Bank unlawfully discriminated by denying them loans based on their DACA status. Dkt. No. 43. Plaintiffs seek to represent a class. Id. ⁋⁋ 39-53. In late 2009, Perez sought a student loan from The Student Loan Corporation, a subsidiary of Citibank and a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.