Sunnergren

Sunnergren v. Bright

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20235:22-cv-00746California458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK E. SUNNERGREN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00746 BLF (PR) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DARIN BRIGHT, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 27)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he is currently housed. On January 3, 2023, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 26. Plaintiff was directed to file a second amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed. Id. at 5. Plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of forty-five days because he needs time to retrieve his legal files, review them, and prepare the second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 27.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.