HotSpot Therapeutics, Inc. v. Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20233:22-cv-04109California5,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HOTSPOT THERAPEUTICS, INC., Case No. 22-cv-04109-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: COUNTERCLAIM

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

v. AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTIONS TO SEAL

NURIX THERAPEUTICS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 56, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant HotSpot Therapeutics, Inc.’s (“HotSpot’s”) Motion to Dismiss Defendant Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.’s (“Nurix’s”) Counterclaims (ECF No. 57) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and related Administrative Motions to Seal (ECF Nos. 57, 60, and 61). On December 21, 2022, Defendant filed an Opposition. ECF No. 59. On December 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Reply. ECF No. 62. ECF No. 63. Having considered the parties’ positions and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff HotSpot’s Motion to Dismiss Nurix’s Counterclaims and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.