Dali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20233:20-cv-06469California942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DALI WIRELESS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-06469-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING

CONCERNING VACATUR

CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Docket No. 283 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Dali Wireless, Inc. (“Dali”) filed suit against Defendant Corning Optical Communications LLC (“Corning”) for patent infringement. Docket No. 154. The Court issued a claim construction order. Docket No. 85. After the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Corning, Dali appealed to the Federal Circuit. Docket No. 276. The parties then entered a settlement to resolve this case. As part of the settlement, the parties agreed that Dali could seek vacatur of the Court’s July 18, 2021 Claim Construction Order, which may be pertinent to Dali’s pending infringement suits against AT&T and CommScope in the Eastern District of Texas. Accordingly, Dali filed an Unopposed Motion for Indicative Ruling Concerning Vacatur. Docket…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.