Sundaram

Sundaram v. Freshworks Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20233:22-cv-06750California3,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MOHAN R. SUNDARAM, Case No. 22-cv-06750-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPOINTING LEAD

v.

PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL

FRESHWORKS INC, et al., Defendants.

Before the Court are dueling motions to appoint lead plaintiff and lead counsel in this action under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). Two prospective class members seek appointment: Mohan R. Sundaram (“Sundaram”), the plaintiff in this action, who seeks appointment of Scott+Scott LLP as lead counsel, see Sundaram Mot. (dkt. 42), and Vivek Nagarajan (“Nagarajan”), who seeks appointment of Pomerantz LLP as lead counsel. See Nagarajan Mot. (dkt. 44). As discussed below, finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court vacates the hearing currently set for February 10, 2023, appoints Sundaram as lead plaintiff in the action, and appoints Scott+Scott LLP as lead counsel. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.