LeGrand
LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONDALISA LEGRAND, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 29, 32 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendant Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) and Rule 12(b)(6). ECF No. 18. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition (ECF No. 29) and Abbott filed a Reply (ECF No. 32). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the February 9, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Abbott’s motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND Abbott is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Abbott Park, Illinois. ECF No. 1 ¶ 10. …