Easley

Easley v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20235:22-cv-02344California567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GARY D EASLEY, Case No. 5:22-cv-02344-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff filed the present action on April 15, 2022. ECF No. 1. Magistrate Judge DeMarchi screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On May 2, 2022, Magistrate Judge DeMarchi issued an order finding that the complaint failed to satisfy the screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and allowed Plaintiff leave to amend by May 23, 2022. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline, so on May 26, 2022, Magistrate Judge DeMarchi recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed. ECF No. 6. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 12. On June 1, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time and ordered Plaintiff to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.