Nextpulse, LLC v. Brunswick Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20234:22-cv-04071California4,376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NEXTPULSE, LLC, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04071-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORGER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND, DENYING REQUEST FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, IN PART MOTION TO SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for attorneys’ fees and costs, Dkt. No. 20 (“Motion”). The Motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 20, 27, and 43. Cross- defendant eGym, Inc. took no position on the Motion. Dkt. No. 26. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand, DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees and cost, and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to seal.2 20 1 Brunswick filed an objection to Nextpulse’s reply. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.