Nextpulse, LLC v. Brunswick Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NEXTPULSE, LLC, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04071-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORGER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND, DENYING REQUEST FOR
v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, IN PART MOTION TO SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for attorneys’ fees and costs, Dkt. No. 20 (“Motion”). The Motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 20, 27, and 43. Cross- defendant eGym, Inc. took no position on the Motion. Dkt. No. 26. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand, DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees and cost, and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to seal.2 20 1 Brunswick filed an objection to Nextpulse’s reply. Dkt.…