Riley

Riley v. Quantumscape Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20235:22-cv-03871California11,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GILBERT RILEY, Case No. 22-cv-03871-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO

v. VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD;

GRANTING CROSS-MOTION TO

QUANTUMSCAPE CORP., CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 17, 27]

12 Before the Court are Petitioner Gilbert Riley’s petition to vacate and Respondent QuantumScape Corporation’s (QuantumScape) cross-motion to confirm the arbitration award issued in Gilbert Riley v. QuantumScape Corp., Case No. 1100110944 (JAMS) (the “Arbitration”). Riley Mot., ECF No. 17; QS Mot., ECF No. 28. Both parties filed replies. Riley Reply, ECF No. 30; QS Reply, ECF No. 31. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the petition to vacate and GRANTS the cross-motion to confirm the arbitration award. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.