Kavcic

Kavcic v. Broadcom Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20233:20-cv-01246California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALEKSANDAR KAVCIC, Case No. 20-cv-01246-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL

v.

BROADCOM INC., et al., Defendants.

12 The Court has addressed the standards for sealing requests in conjunction with case filings, see In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 556 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (N.D. Cal. 2021), and that decision is incorporated here. In pertinent summary, “judicial records are public documents almost by definition, and the public is entitled to access by default.” Id. at 1107 (quoting Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (when considering a request to seal, “we start with a strong presumption in favor of access to court records.”) (quotation omitted)). The party seeking to seal a document bears the burden of articulating “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.