McGhee

McGhee v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20234:20-cv-05135California1,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIJUE ADOLPHUS MCGHEE, Case No. 20-cv-05135-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

REOPEN

v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 R. JAIME-DAUMY, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) officers Jaime-Daumy and Wren. On March 22, 2021, the Court dismissed this case for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 16. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to reopen this action. Dkt. No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, this request is DENIED. DISCUSSION I. Procedural History On or about July 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. On September 28, 2020, the Court found that the complaint’s allegation that SQSP officer Jaime-Daumy read Plaintiff’s legal mail that was addressed to his appellate counsel, and that SQSP officer Wren allowed it, stated cognizable First, Sixth, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.