Bibi

Bibi v. VxL Enterprises, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20233:21-cv-04670California3,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OMAR BIBI, Case No. 21-cv-04670-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. DANIEL & YEAGER’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DANIEL & YEAGER, LLC, et al., Docket No. 78 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff Omar Bibi is a physician. He has filed a retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C § 1981 against defendant Daniel & Yeager, LLC (“D&Y”). According to Dr. Bibi, D&Y terminated his contract to provide COVID-related medical services at a field hospital located at San Quentin State Prison (“Prison”) because he lodged a complaint about racially discriminatory behavior by a supervisor at the Prison. Currently pending before the Court is D&Y’s motion for summary judgment as to (1) Dr. Bibi’s retaliation claim and (2) Dr. Bibi’s request for punitive damages. Having considered the parties’ briefs as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS D&Y’s motion in its entirety. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.