Joseph
Joseph v. City of San Jose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 RHAWN JOSEPH, Case No. 19-cv-01294-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 120, 160 Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court are cross motions for summary judgment – Plaintiff has filed two such motions (dkts. 110, 120), and Defendants have filed one (dkt. 160). As for Plaintiff’s motions, Defendants have responded (see dkts. 113, 126), and Plaintiff has filed replies (see dkts. 114, 127). As for Defendants’ motion, Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 161), and Defendants have not filed any reply. The matters, therefore, have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision. The court finds that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), these matters are suitable for disposition without oral argument; and, for the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s motions are denied and…