Horton

Horton v. Molina

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20233:17-cv-01915-JSCCalifornia1,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL J. HORTON, Case No. 17-cv-01915-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ENFORCING SETTLEMENT

v. AGREEMENT

PARSONS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 176 Defendants.

12 Jury trial in this excessive force case was scheduled to commence on October 24, 2022. The jury pool was summoned, online juror questionnaires completed, and initial excusal orders made. On the Friday evening before the Monday trial, the parties notified the Court they had settled the action. So, that weekend, the jury commissioner notified all of the summoned jurors they did not have to appear for the Monday trial. Here we are, over three months later, and the case has yet to be dismissed. Instead, Defendant Molina moves to enforce the settlement. (Dkt. No. 176. ) After carefully considering the parties’ submissions, and having had the benefit of oral argument on February 9, 2023, the Court grants the motion to enforce the settlement. But it will enforce the settlement the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.