DOE

DOE v. Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20235:22-cv-02566California2,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 22-cv-02566-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. AND DEFENDANT’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

APPLE INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE SEAL

BENEFIT PLAN,

12 Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 16, 21, 23 13 In connection with Defendant Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint, both Plaintiff and Defendant seek to file portions of their briefs and supporting papers under seal. ECF Nos. 16 (“Mot. Seal MTD”), 21 (“Mot. Seal Opp.”), 23 (“Mot. Seal Reply”). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the parties’ motions to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.