Young

Young v. Chao

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20233:19-cv-01411California1,806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-01411-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

v. REVIEW OF COSTS

PETE BUTTIGIEG, Re: Dkt. No. 145 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cheryl Young, pro se, brought this action challenging an EEOC decision in which she largely prevailed but did not receive an acceptable position for reinstatement, and raising other claims regarding her employment at the Department of Transportation. Defendant the Secretary of Transportation (the “Secretary”) asserted counterclaims seeking to compel Young to repay the monetary award she received through EEOC proceedings if she did not prevail on her claim for de novo review. The parties previously stipulated to dismiss Young’s claim for de novo review and the Secretary’s counterclaims. The Secretary prevailed on summary judgment as to Young’s remaining claims. The Secretary sought costs totaling $7,834.90, of which the Clerk disallowed 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.