Mauricio

Mauricio v. Suncrest Health Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20235:22-cv-02698California2,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ALEX MAURICIO, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-02698-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND DENYING MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

SUNCREST HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 11 Defendant.

Plaintiffs Alex Mauricio and Bristol Hospice LLC (“Bristol,” collectively with Mauricio, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, asserting California Labor Code violations against Mr. Mauricio’s former employer, Defendant Suncrest Health Services, LLC (“Suncrest” or “Defendant”). Suncrest removed the case to this district on diversity jurisdiction and filed a motion to dismiss shortly thereafter. Dkt. No. 6 (“Mot. Dismiss”). Plaintiffs then moved to remand this case to state court. Dkt. No. 11 (“Mot. Remand”). Having considered the briefings for both Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s motions, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to remand and DENIES AS MOOT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.