Chapman

Chapman v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20234:22-cv-01446California5,772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCEL E. CHAPMAN, Case No. 22-cv-01446-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; DENYING REMAINING

MOTIONS

DOUG RICHARDSON, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 15, 16, 20 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Maguire Correctional Facility, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants San Mateo County, San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office sergeant Doug Richardson and San Mateo Correctional Health Services nurse Amanda Anguelouch were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff alleges that on December 7, 2021, citing defendant San Mateo County’s policy that required inmates to wear jail sandals, defendants Richardson and Anguelouch deprived Plaintiff of his medically necessary footwear. This order addresses the following motions: (1) Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 15;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.