Faizi
Faizi v. Temori
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION RE
CONTEMPT
BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame” or “company”) against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including various allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame eateries. Mr. Faizi now moves, on Falafel Flame’s behalf, for an order finding defendants in civil contempt and liable for sanctions for failing to comply with this Court’s preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 35). Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments and testimony presented at the proceedings held on February…