Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 20235:22-cv-04224California3,911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION RE

CONTEMPT

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame” or “company”) against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including various allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame eateries. Mr. Faizi now moves, on Falafel Flame’s behalf, for an order finding defendants in civil contempt and liable for sanctions for failing to comply with this Court’s preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 35). Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments and testimony presented at the proceedings held on February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.