Tabron

Tabron v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20233:21-cv-04517California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH DANIEL TABRON, Case No. 21-cv-04517-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW

v. CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED

RAYMOND MADDEN,

Defendant.

12 13 In the instant federal habeas action, United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley found that Petitioner had stated cognizable claims and ordered Respondent to file an answer. Docket No. 9. After Respondent declined Magistrate Judge Corley’s jurisdiction, the action was reassigned to the undersigned. Docket Nos. 11-13. After an extension of time, Respondent filed an Answer. Docket Nos. 20, 21. Petitioner subsequently filed a letter asking for the Court to stay this matter indefinitely while Petitioner awaits the outcome of a state proceeding. Dkt. No. 25. The Court declined Petitioner’s request, noting that Petitioner had not provided sufficient information for the Court to determine whether a stay was warranted. Docket No. 28. However, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.