Harris
Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-09445-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION
DOOR DASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.
10 Kevin Harris, who is proceeding without representation by a lawyer, sued DoorDash for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Defendant seeks to compel arbitration. Because the briefing exposed some ambiguity regarding contract formation, the Court requests additional briefing and evidence. Defendant may file further papers by March 2, 2023. Plaintiff should respond on or before March 23, 2023. Any legal argument should be limited to five pages. Supplementary evidentiary filings may exceed that limit. The hearing scheduled for February 23, 2023 is VACATED. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiff alleges he worked as a “dasher” for DoorDash between November 23, 2020, and November 29, 2021. (Dkt. No. 7 ¶ 6.) Plaintiff details…