Stickles

Stickles v. Atria Senior Living, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20233:20-cv-09220California1,736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE STICKLES and MICHELE

RHODES,

No. C 20-09220 WHA Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER RE MOTION TO ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC., and CLARIFY OR MODIFY ATRIA MANAGEMENT CLASS DEFINITION OR

COMPANY, LLC, COMPEL ARBITRATIONS

AND VACATING HEARING

Defendants.

INTRODUCTION In this wage-and-hour class action, defendants move to clarify or modify the class definition, or to compel arbitrations in the alternative. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The facts underlying this action are described more fully in our prior order (Dkt. No. 107). In short, plaintiffs George Stickles and Michele Rhodes worked as “Community Sales Directors” (CSDs) for defendants, Atria Senior Living, Inc., and Atria Management Company, LLC. This action concerns whether defendants improperly classified CSDs as exempt outside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.