Travis

Travis v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20233:22-cv-04199California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS TRAVIS, Case No. 22-cv-04199-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS

v. RAMERIZE AND D. RAMIREZ

J. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants.

12 On or about July 19, 2022, Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), commenced this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 19, 2022, the Court screened the operative complaint and found that it stated cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against defendants SVSP correctional officers J. Gomez, Barnes, Ramerize, and Muniz and nurse D. Ramirez. Dkt. No. 25. The Court ordered service on Defendants pursuant to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (“CDCR”) e-service program for civil rights cases from prisoners in the CDCR’s custody. Id. Pursuant to this program, on February 9, 2023, the CDCR filed a completed CDCR Report of E-Service Waiver advising the court that defendants Gomez,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.