Brumfield

Brumfield v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20234:22-cv-05369California1,034 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CEDRIC JAMAL BRUMFIELD, Case No. 22-cv-05369-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

DANA D. MOORE, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at James Crabtree Correctional Center in Helena, Oklahoma, has filed this pro se action. His complaint (Dkt. No. 6) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.