In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20235:19-cv-04286California4,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ASIF KUMANDAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

SEAL

GOOGLE LLC, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 304, 345 358, 369] Defendants.

12

14 Before the Court are several motions to seal materials submitted with the parties’ briefing on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification. See ECF Nos. 304, 345 358. The parties also submitted a request to seal portions of the Court’s order on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. See ECF No. 369. For the reasons stated below, the motion at ECF No. 304 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART without prejudice and the motions at ECF Nos. 345, 358, and 369 are GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. Of Honolulu,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.