Pierce

Pierce v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20233:21-cv-04325California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAJI PIERCE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04325-AGT Plaintiffs, y. ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. No.

EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY

DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. Defendants have moved to seal excerpts from Dorian West Blair’s deposition transcript. Defendants submitted these excerpts with their motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 72-1. The only reason defendants offer for sealing the excerpts is that the Court designated West Blair’s deposition as confidential. See Dkt. 73-1 at 11 n.2; Dkt. 42. That designation isn’t a “compelling reason” for sealing the deposition transcript at the summary judgment stage. Kamakana y. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) (simplified); see also Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1136 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[T]he pre- sumption of [public] access is not rebutted where, as here, documents subject to a protective order are filed under seal as attachments to a dispositive motion.”). West Blair was formerly EBMUD’s diversity and inclusion officer. She testified about matters relevant to the merits…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.