IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO Case No. 20-cv-02155-LB
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY
LITIGATION ORDER DENYING OBJECTORS’
MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
AND INCENTIVE AWARDS
This Document Relates To: Re: ECF Nos. 262, 263 ALL ACTIONS. 16 INTRODUCTION In this class action against Zoom Video Communications, the plaintiffs alleged that Zoom improperly shared their data through third-party software-development kits from companies such as Facebook and Google, claimed to have end-to-end encryption when it did not, and failed to prevent “Zoombombing” (disruptions of Zoom meetings by third-party actors).1 The parties settled the case, and the court approved the settlement over the objections of several class members.2 Two appeals were filed: one by objectors Alvery Neace and Sammy Rodgers and one 24 25 26 1 Second Am. Compl. (SAC) – ECF No. 179 at 3–5 (¶¶…