Castillo

Castillo v. St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20233:22-cv-00107California1,841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRADLEY CASTILLO, Case No. 22-cv-00107-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, CARDIOLOGY JUDGMENT DIVISION, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 30 Defendants. 12 On February 24, 2023, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. As discussed at the hearing, the trial date has been moved to June 5, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. The pretrial hearing will be held on June 1, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. (not May 30, as discussed at the hearing). 17 DISCUSSION Plaintiff Bradley Castillo alleges the following claims under California law: (1) age and discrimination and harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”); (2) disability discrimination and harassment under FEHA; (3) failure to provide an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.