Straw
Straw v. LinkedIn Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANDREW U.D. STRAW, Case No. 22-cv-07718-VKD
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A
DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND MOTION FOR SERVICE
LINKEDIN CORP., et al. Re: Dkt. No. 41, 43, 44 Defendants. On December 7, 2022, plaintiff Andrew U.D. Straw, filed an “Employment Discrimination Complaint” against LinkedIn Corporation (“LinkedIn”), alleging that LinkedIn unlawfully closed his “longstanding LinkedIn.com account for having complained about the discrimination of [his] former employer, the Indiana Supreme Court.” Dkt. No. 1 at 1. The complaint indicates that Mr. Straw is a lawyer. He is representing himself in this matter. Mr. Straw was given leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and service of process on LinkedIn was completed by the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”). See Dkt. Nos. 2, 5, 13. …