Gastelum

Gastelum v. TJX Companies

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20235:21-cv-06714California1,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 21-cv-06714-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DECLINING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE

UNRUH ACT CLAIM

THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.,

Defendant.

13 Asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12182, et seq. and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51- 53, pro se plaintiff Fernando Gastelum challenges accessibility barriers he claims he encountered at stores allegedly owned or operated by defendant The TJX Companies, Inc. (“TJX”). In its most recent effort to dismiss Mr. Gastelum’s claims based on issues of jurisdiction and standing, TJX contended that Mr. Gastelum lacked Article III standing to pursue his ADA claim. TJX also argued that the Court should either dismiss Mr. Gastelum’s Unruh Act claim or decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over that claim. See Dkt. No. 28. On January 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.