Lonnie Lillard v. Dewayne Hendrix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 202423-35049California416 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONNIE EUGENE LILLARD, No. 23-35049

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00966-SB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden, FCI Sheridan,

Respondent-Appellee.

AMADOR SANCHEZ MENDOZA, AKA No. 23-35059 Amador Sanchez, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00559-SB Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision Portland, Oregon

Before: RAWLINSON, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Lonnie Lillard and Amador Mendoza1 appeal the magistrate judge’s denial

of the consolidated 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petitions filed by current and former

individuals in custody at the Federal Correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.