Pickett

Pickett v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20233:20-cv-01772California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT ERIC PICKETT, Case No. 20-cv-01772-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

KILOLO KAJAKAZI, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff brought this action for judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying his claim for disability benefits. After plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment, the parties stipulated to voluntarily remand the case for further proceedings. Dkts. 22, 27. The Court granted the stipulation and entered judgment based on that stipulation and order. Dkts. 28, 29. Following entry of judgment, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation awarding plaintiff $6,000.00 in attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”). Dkt. 31. On remand, plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits in the amount of $133,408.12. See Dkt. 32-2 (Harding Decl.) ¶¶ 9–11;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.