Steward

Steward v. Stevenson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20233:20-cv-09310California446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON J. STEWARD, Case No. 20-cv-09310-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL, AND GRANTING

STEVENSON, et al., PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 In the instant action, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to a single claim in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. Docket No. 20. After several extensions of time, Defendants moved for summary judgment. Docket No. 39. Plaintiff sought, and was granted, an extension of time to oppose Defendants’ motion. Docket Nos. 40, 41. However, Plaintiff’s deadline has passed, and no opposition has been filed. See generally, Docket. In case Plaintiff is waiting for a ruling on his pending motion to be appointed counsel before filing his opposition, the Court clarifies that Plaintiff’s motion to be appointed counsel is DENIED. Docket No. 33. A district court has the discretion under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.