Marshall

Marshall v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20235:19-cv-06862-SVKCalifornia1,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 C.J.M., Case No. 19-cv-06862-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S v. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 42 U.S.C. § 406(B) Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on October 22, 2019, seeking review of a decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits. Dkt. 1. All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 11, 12. After Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 21), the Parties stipulated to remand the case to the agency for further proceedings, and the Court granted the stipulation. Dkt. 22, 23. The Court subsequently granted the Parties’ stipulation to award Plaintiff $7,000.00 in attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”). Dkt. 25, 26. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.