BillFloat Inc. v. Collins Cash Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20233:20-cv-09325California4,784 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BILLFLOAT INC., Case No. 20-cv-09325-EMC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION
v. FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF
LAW AND FOR NEW TRIAL, AND
COLLINS CASH INC., et al., GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
Defendants. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Docket Nos. 137, 138, 141
13 14 I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff BillFloat Inc. (“BillFloat”) sued the defendants Collins Cash Inc. (“Collins Cash”) and its owner Abraham Cohen (collectively, “Defendants”) for, inter alia, trademark infringement and breach of contract. After a four-day trial solely on the trademark infringement claim, the jury found in favor of Defendants. Now pending before this Court are (1) BillFloat’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) under Rule 50(b), or alternatively, for a new trial under Rule 59(a) of the Federal Rules…