BillFloat Inc. v. Collins Cash Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20233:20-cv-09325California4,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BILLFLOAT INC., Case No. 20-cv-09325-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION

v. FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF

LAW AND FOR NEW TRIAL, AND

COLLINS CASH INC., et al., GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

Defendants. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Docket Nos. 137, 138, 141

13 14 I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff BillFloat Inc. (“BillFloat”) sued the defendants Collins Cash Inc. (“Collins Cash”) and its owner Abraham Cohen (collectively, “Defendants”) for, inter alia, trademark infringement and breach of contract. After a four-day trial solely on the trademark infringement claim, the jury found in favor of Defendants. Now pending before this Court are (1) BillFloat’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) under Rule 50(b), or alternatively, for a new trial under Rule 59(a) of the Federal Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.