Olsen
Olsen v. Hortica Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID OLSEN, Case No. 5:21-cv-03891-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
HORTICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: ECF No. 22 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff David Olsen brings this action asserting four claims against Defendant Hortica Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance Company1: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) disparate treatment in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a); and (4) wrongful termination in violation of public policy. ECF No. 21 (“Am. Compl.”). Defendant moves to dismiss all claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Notice of Motion, ECF No. 22. The Court finds the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ written…