Olsen

Olsen v. Hortica Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20235:21-cv-03891California4,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID OLSEN, Case No. 5:21-cv-03891-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

HORTICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: ECF No. 22 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff David Olsen brings this action asserting four claims against Defendant Hortica Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance Company1: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) disparate treatment in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a); and (4) wrongful termination in violation of public policy. ECF No. 21 (“Am. Compl.”). Defendant moves to dismiss all claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Notice of Motion, ECF No. 22. The Court finds the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.